| | |
|
| |
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
Competitive Snapshot - Overland Storage NEOs T24 vs. SuperLoader 3
Target Market
- Small business (<100 employees)
- 1 part-time IT person managing data / IT
infrastructure
- Data
storage growing < 30% annually
- Lack of sufficient backup/archive solution |
Key Selling Points:
- More Storage Capacity
- Lower cost ownership
- Superior Investment protection
- Faster data access
- Better data availability
- Higher reliability |
|
| |
Overland Storage
NEOs T24 |
Quantum
Super Loader 3 |
The Overland Storage
NEOs T24 Advantage |
| |
|
|
|
|
| # Cartridge Slots |
24 |
16 |
- 50% more Storage
Capacity provides superior investment protection by
accommodating growth in storage requirements
- 100% faster data
transfer decreases backup windows, restores data
faster, reduces administrative overhead and increases efficiency
- 50% better density
delivers more storage in a minimal amount of rack space, making room
for mission critical devices
- Mail slot
feature provides secure and convenient access to data cartridges,
ensuring data integrity & improving data accessibility
- Redundant power
option improves data availability and reduces costly
downtime, providing a lower purchase price
- Flexible interface
options enable use in a broader range of IT
environments and capitalize on the performance advantages of native
fiber channel
- 33% higher
reliability improves data availability and reduces
costly downtime, providing a lower cost of ownership
- Lower cost/slot
provides more cost-effective data storage
- Lower cost/TB
provides more efficient use of storage expenditures
|
|
| Tape Drives |
2 |
1 |
|
| Drive Types |
LTO-6, LTO-5, LTO-4 |
LTO-6, LTO-5, LTO-4 |
|
| Remote Management |
√ |
√ |
|
| Removable Magazines |
√ |
√ |
|
| Mail Slots |
√ |
x |
|
| Redundant Power Option |
√ |
x |
|
| FC Interface |
√ |
x |
|
| Reliability (MSBF) |
>2,000,000 |
1,500,000 |
|
| Avg. Cost/Slot |
$280 |
$294 |
|
| Avg. Cost/TB |
$45 |
$47 |
|
| |
| | |
|
|
|